The website that hosts the video calls him a "chimp" which for those who don't know, is partly true and partly wrong. He is a bonobo. They are also called pygmy chimps.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/74e7d/74e7d4db7db55347705f654243df36d9f660cbba" alt=""
Kanzi and his teacher's achievements are remarkable, but so is the limit of his language abilities. He does understand syntax (which is a HUGE accomplishment & discovery for science), but he still doesn't have the ability to carry on complex conversations, tell stories, use past tense and other tenses (though there is a way he can talk about the future, usually his desires for the immediate future), and his vocabulary is nowhere near the hundreds of thousands of words that adult humans have in their repertoire. To be fair, this may be dependent on the time and creativity of his teachers who must design new lexigrams.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1b150/1b1502c3269ea73dd904656aececac3e463eb86c" alt=""
From their website:
"Great Ape Trust is dedicated to providing sanctuary and an honorable life for great apes, studying the intelligence of great apes, advancing conservation of great apes and providing unique educational experiences about great apes. Great Ape Trust of Iowa is a 501(c) 3 not-for-profit organization and is certified by the American Zoo and Aquarium Association (AZA)."
It looks like Sue Savage-Rumbaugh finally realized her dream of giving Kanzi & Co. a better life than a laboratory could provide. Maybe she just got tired of living in Georgia. Or maybe her funding ran out. Or maybe Kanzi told her he was ready to live somewhere else.
In any case, the Great Ape Trust looks like a wonderful place and there is still plenty of quality research being conducted by more than a dozen LRC affiliated scientists, including Dorothy Fragaszy who along with Leighty published "Primates in cyberspace: Using interactive computer tasks to study perception and action in nonhuman animals. 2003. Anim. Cogn. 6: 137-139." as well as "Joystick acquisition in tufted capuchins (Cebus apella).2003. Anim. Cogn. 6:141-148." I bet these two experts could provide some very interesting commentary on Kanzi's Ms. Pac-Man skills.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/eebd2/eebd243cd0a33cf68e233187c83deeb85e481d23" alt=""
4 comments:
hi! i got sent here from a comment you sent to Heather. i know Kanzi! my teacher told me about this bonobo monkey. its very smart and its like a human, i heard.
please come to my blog, www.syfox133.com
cya,
syfox
Hi Slyfox133,
Thanks for your comment. Kanzi is indeed very bright. Apes generally are especially when they get to go to "school" like Kanzi did!
Remember bonobos are apes, not monkeys. Lots of people get the two confused but it;s easy to keep them straight: Monkeys have tails; apes don't.
Humans are apes. So are chimps, gorillas, and orangutans. Gibbons are called "lesser apes" only because they are a lot smaller than the "land apes" (gibbons are arboreal meaning they live high in the canopies of trees). Gibbons are also more like monkeys because they don't show the same cognitive skills that other apes do... i.e. they aren't as "smart."
I keep hearing that kanzi understands syntax but no one has said exactly what phrase was understood or put together by kanzi.
can someone answer this.
not4others,
It's not just one phrase that Kanji has demonstrated syntax for, but several different ones.
To demonstrate an understanding of syntax, he'd have to show he understands word order - for instance - the difference between pouring water into soda vs pouring soda into water.
I have seen Kanji correctly perform such actions when asked. If asked to water water into Coke, he does (rather than pouring Coke into water).
Another way he has demonstrated an understanding of syntax is to understand prepositional phrases: e.g. Take the pine needles in the refrigerator outdoors. Rather than taking the pine needles sitting in front of him outside, he goes to the fridge to take the ones inside it outdoors.
That demonstrates a remarkable understanding of language - one that is unsurpassed by any other non-human.
~ Thanks for you comment and question!
Post a Comment